<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>North and West Melbourne Association</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nwma.org.au/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nwma.org.au</link>
	<description>North and West Melbourne Association information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>La Trobe Close submission to Minister Richard Wynn</title>
		<link>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2010/02/la-trobe-close-submission-to-minister-richard-wynn</link>
		<comments>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2010/02/la-trobe-close-submission-to-minister-richard-wynn#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nwma.org.au/?p=614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The NWMA&#8217;s submission sent on the 15 January 2010 to the Hon Richard Wynne, Minister for Housing on the proposed redevelopment of La Trobe Close. For readers information<br />
<em><br />
Dear Minister</em></p>
<p>Re 210-232 Chetwynd Street, 21-43 Courtney Street and 181-197 Howard Street, North&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NWMA&#8217;s submission sent on the 15 January 2010 to the Hon Richard Wynne, Minister for Housing on the proposed redevelopment of La Trobe Close. For readers information<br />
<em><br />
Dear Minister</p>
<p>Re 210-232 Chetwynd Street, 21-43 Courtney Street and 181-197 Howard Street, North Melbourne.<br />
We wish to make the following submission to the Minister for Housing, Richard Wynne MP, on the Government’s proposal for the Latrobe Close redevelopment on the corner of Howard, Chetwynd and Courtney Streets, North Melbourne.</p>
<p>The North and West Melbourne Association (NWMA), through its predecessor the North Melbourne Association, was established in 1967 and has operated continuously since that date.  Its substantial membership consists of residents and workers from North and West Melbourne.  The Association and its members were involved in the initial consultation with the government authorities and its consultants regarding the purchase of this site and its proposed redevelopment.  Undertakings were given at that time to the community regarding a number of issues in relation to this site, particularly child care and open space.</p>
<p>The Association became involved in this latest proposal for this site when it became public knowledge and was well advanced in government and Council processes in late November/early December, 2009.  By this time, the Local Member for Melbourne, Bronwyn Pike, had been briefed by the Department of Housing in late October 2009.  The City of Melbourne Planning officers had also had a number of meetings with Government representatives and their consultants on this redevelopment. </p>
<p>The NWMA is very concerned about the quality of the consultation, the planning process surrounding this development and the situation we now find ourselves in.  The Association believes this proposal fails every principle of good governance and proper and orderly planning of this area, apart from the provision of increased social housing in the area.</p>
<p>The concerns of the NWMA are as follows:<br />
Height and Built Form<br />
The height and built form is grossly excessive and should be no greater than 9 metres and should be consistent with the built form of the Residential 1 parts of North Melbourne.  The proposal as it stands creates an alarming precedent, should it ever be approved and constructed.  It would essentially open up most of the inner Melbourne Residential 1 zone to inappropriate high rise development.<br />
The Association also believes that the building proposed has little relationship with the surrounding streetscapes and, in fact, detracts from their value and amenity.</p>
<p>Heritage<br />
 The proposal has little or no regard for the heritage built form in the area, where it is proposed to demolish or significantly modify important heritage buildings on the site.  It is of concern to the Association that our Council did not vigorously pursue this matter with the Department.  Other submissions will deal with this issue in more detail.  The Association requests that an independent heritage advisor be consulted to assess all structures on the site and to advise on the appropriate form of any new development.</p>
<p>Sustainability.<br />
•	Due to the inadequate public consultation and lack of publicly available documentation on this development, it has not been possible for the NWMA to make an informed response to the issues around sustainability.  The NWMA is of the view that this development should not be designed using minimum standards but should be state of the art in its environmental performance standards. We also believe that the height and density and orientation of the current proposal does not promote good environmental practice.  </p>
<p>Traffic and Parking</p>
<p>The Association believes that development as proposed by the Government does not provide sufficient resident and visitor car-parking on site.  We have been advised that this development will not have access to the resident parking scheme administered by the Council.  Given that all kerbside and centre of road parking in the area is time limited, we believe that this mix is a recipe for disaster.  Where will the residents and visitors park?   This reinforces our conclusion that the proposal represents an over development, and is inappropriate for the site.  The Association is of the strong opinion that Government should be leading by example and make an informed assessment of the actual needs for parking and traffic and not rely on the minimum provisions prescribed under the planning scheme.<br />
The Association is totally opposed to any modification to centre of road medians and nature strips in the surrounding streets.</p>
<p>Current Public Housing Stock on site<br />
The Association is totally opposed to the sale of the area identified as Stage 2 in the development onto the private market.  We believe that this important family and other accommodation is of a reasonable standard to be upgraded, and retained in public ownership.</p>
<p>Child Care and Open Space<br />
When the site was purchased, amongst many other things, agreement was given for the construction of an employment and community based child care facility incorporating a shared open space component on the site of the proposed stage 1 of the development (the warehouse at 210 Chetwynd Street and the adjoining vacant land to the North).<br />
Several attempts were made by both the Community and the Council to have the proposed childcare facility and open space developed &#8211; without success.  The Association now believes that the need for quality early childhood education and care in inner Melbourne has reached a critical level and the obligation on the landowners to provide such a facility should not be allowed to lapse, as it was part of the original agreement with the community.</p>
<p>Recommendations.</p>
<p>The NWMA recommends that:<br />
1.	The staged development proposed for the entire site in its current form be abandoned.<br />
2.	In consultation with the Association and the community, a strategy be drawn up for the future use and development of the site, including<br />
a.	More appropriate built form and scale<br />
b.	Recognition of heritage issues<br />
c.	Appropriate tenancy and occupancy mix in public ownership<br />
d.	Satisfactory resolution of traffic and parking issues<br />
3.	The Government approach the Church of England Property Trust with a view to acquiring the land immediately to the South of the site fronting Queensberry and Chetwynd Streets. This will allow for an expanded site that will accommodate an appropriate social housing development with a much-needed early childhood education facility included.  We believe the process for the sale of this land within the Church is well advanced.<br />
4.	Any planning to be undertaken on this site for the provision of an early childhood education centre be subject to consultation with the Melbourne City Council in the preparation of its ‘Municipal Early Years Plan’ for families and children aged 0-12 years for the 2009-2013 period.<br />
5.	The planning and implementation of this development should incorporate the highest available standards of environmental performances and be an exemplar for buildings of this residential type in the same way as Council House 2 has been for commercial administrative buildings.<br />
6.	Consideration be given to the future of the eastern carriageway of Chetwynd Street between Courtney and Queensberry Streets for public open space.<br />
7.	The existing housing stock on the site be retained for public housing and that it be upgraded.</p>
<p>Yours sincerely,	</p>
<p>Kevin Chamberlin and Bill Cook<br />
On behalf of the North and West Melbourne Association Inc.</p>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2010/02/la-trobe-close-submission-to-minister-richard-wynn/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Council support mandatory height limit and open space for La Trobe Close</title>
		<link>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/12/council-support-mandatory-height-limit-and-open-space-for-la-trobe-close</link>
		<comments>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/12/council-support-mandatory-height-limit-and-open-space-for-la-trobe-close#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 06:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic and access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nwma.org.au/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The </strong><strong>City of Melbourne</strong><strong> Planning Committee met on 1st Dec 2009,  the LaTrobe Close Re Development was one of the items on the agenda.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The NWMA supports the provision of social housing in North and West Melbourne, though we insist that government&#8230;</strong></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The </strong><strong>City of Melbourne</strong><strong> Planning Committee met on 1st Dec 2009,  the LaTrobe Close Re Development was one of the items on the agenda.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The NWMA supports the provision of social housing in North and West Melbourne, though we insist that government adopts its own policy of social housing integrated with private housing, that quality be maintained, that there be adequate provision of open space and that government keeps adequate statistics of the quantity of social housing and subsidised housing in each residential area. </strong></p>
<p>Constancy of communication is so important &#8211; in hind-sight we all should have been copying some of our early correspondence to Shiran Wickramasinghe, Manager Planning and Building</p>
<p><a href="mailto:Shiran.Wickramasinghe@melbourne.vic.gov.au">Shiran.Wickramasinghe@melbourne.vic.gov.au</a></p>
<p>He is relatively new to this Council (2008) and from his report he seemed NOT to be aware of</p>
<p>the history of the particular Open Space and the VCAT hearing rejecting its use as a car park,</p>
<p>of the clamour for Open Space in &#8220;North West 2010 Local Plan&#8221; and its mention of Latrobe Close in particular,</p>
<p>of the neighbourhood character in North and West Melbourne especially  building facades, fences and</p>
<p>he did not mention that the Wholesale Meat Market and St Mary&#8217;s Church were Heritage Victoria listed.</p>
<p>He had recommended approval of the plan with quite a few minor conditions.</p>
<p>Fortunately a flow of correspondence had been maintained to Councillors as new ideas/information became available &#8211; it is so important that we give them information well before a Committee meeting so that they have time to mull over and discuss the issues amongst themselves.</p>
<p>We are indebted to:</p>
<p>Cr Shanahan for referring this proposal to the Planning Committee;</p>
<p>Peter Clarke, Chairmen of the Committee for his usual knowledge of the issues and his usual efficiency &#8211; he had a formal motion covering the major issues of Open Space and Height and Density already prepared;</p>
<p>Lord Mayor for his blunt, concise statement that if this was a private development it would have been thrown out immediately, and that government cannot expect a different set of height limits to private enterprise;</p>
<p>Cr Oke for adding the amendment re rubbish collection;</p>
<p>and to the Committee as a whole for their unanimous support.</p>
<p>Ray Cowling did not need to speak on the reasoning for maintaining the Open Space, but spoke on our appreciation, and the need for better communication with the Council Planning Dept re Ministerial applications,  rubbish collection and need for further support from the Council.</p>
<p>Cr Peter Clarke in response made it abundantly clear that the future of the proposal depended on our ability to lobby the two inner city members most involved in the proposal, Minister’s  Pike and Wynne (Minister responsible for public housing), especially as both are in Cabinet.</p>
<p>Relevant email addresses are:</p>
<p><a href="mailto:Lindsay.Tanner.MP@aph.gov.au">Lindsay.Tanner.MP@aph.gov.au</a>; responsible for providing the funds for the project,</p>
<p><a href="mailto:richard.wynne@parliament.vic.gov.au">richard.wynne@parliament.vic.gov.au</a>; responsible for Public Housing</p>
<p><a href="mailto:justin.madden@parliament.vic.gov.au">justin.madden@parliament.vic.gov.au</a>; responsible for Planning decisions,</p>
<p>and our local MLA, <a href="mailto:bronwyn.pike@parliament.vic.gov.au">bronwyn.pike@parliament.vic.gov.au</a>;</p>
<p>Angela Williams spoke on the Heritage and design concerns with a clear power point presentation showing a thorough understanding of the detailed impact of the development, a presentation that cries out to be presented to the architects. Doone Clifton spoke on local community needs which could have been satisfied on this site such as elderly citizens housing.</p>
<p>The following recommendations were passed unanimously by the Planning Committee:<br />
* The buildings should not exceed a height at any point greater than 14m.<br />
* The existing publicly accessible open space area adjoining Chetwynd<br />
Street be retained or an equivalent area in the development area<br />
be retained as publicly accessible open space.<br />
* There is a reduction of 30% in the number of units.<br />
* Redesign of waste management to allow on-site collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/12/council-support-mandatory-height-limit-and-open-space-for-la-trobe-close/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest Resident Meeting on Latrobe Close on December 3</title>
		<link>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/12/latest-resident-meeting-on-latrobe-close-on-december-3</link>
		<comments>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/12/latest-resident-meeting-on-latrobe-close-on-december-3#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nwma.org.au/?p=598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday 3 December 2009, the NWMA in conjunction with the Latrobe Close Group, convened a public meeting at the Castle Hotel, attended by 24 people.</p>
<p>Latrobe Close is bounded by Chetwynd, Courtney and Howard Streets North Melbourne, where the State&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday 3 December 2009, the NWMA in conjunction with the Latrobe Close Group, convened a public meeting at the Castle Hotel, attended by 24 people.</p>
<p>Latrobe Close is bounded by Chetwynd, Courtney and Howard Streets North Melbourne, where the State Government, with Federal Government funding propose to construct a seven storey block of residential units. This proposal has been opposed by the Council of the City of Melbourne.</p>
<p>As a result of public protest and pressure applied to the local member, the Minister for Housing, Richard Wynne has agreed to defer a decision on the this development to allow further consultation to take place between Monday December 7, 2009 and closing on Friday January 15, 2010. The public meeting has appointed a sub-committee where further members are welcome, to prepare a community submission.</p>
<p>This sub-committee will be meeting on Wednesday 9th at 6 to 7,30 pm at the Castle Hotel, first floor, corner of Wreckyn and Courtney Streets North Melbourne &#8211; all welcome.</p>
<p>It is important that members of the community make their own submission on this development to the Minister for Housing, with copies to local MP’s Bronwyn Pike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/12/latest-resident-meeting-on-latrobe-close-on-december-3/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LaTrobe Close Redevelopment-meeting with Bronwyn Pike 1/12/2009</title>
		<link>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/12/latrobe-close-redevelopment-meeting-with-bronwyn-pike-1122009</link>
		<comments>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/12/latrobe-close-redevelopment-meeting-with-bronwyn-pike-1122009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alba</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nwma.org.au/?p=593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A briefing meeting on Latrobe Close was held for local residents at the office of local member Bronwyn Pike at 6.00pm on Tuesday, December 1, 2009 with between fifty and sixty people from the surrounding area attending. As well as&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A briefing meeting on Latrobe Close was held for local residents at the office of local member Bronwyn Pike at 6.00pm on Tuesday, December 1, 2009 with between fifty and sixty people from the surrounding area attending. As well as Minister Pike and representatives from her office, there was a representative from Minister Wynn’s office, project team members from the Department of Human Services and representatives from town planning consultants, Davis Langdon.</p>
<p>Despite the number of experts in attendance, many of the questions asked by the locals failed to receive convincing answers. It was all about trusting the experts, who inevitably gave answers that did not conform with the opinions of the attendees as to how the development should proceed, especially with the lack of consultation on the part of the proponents and the appalling lack of a proper due process to deal with the planning of these projects involving State defined ‘social housing’ and ‘nation-building’ money.</p>
<p>Examples of the ‘spin’ answers include:</p>
<ul>
<li>The      justification of seven stories, being objectively determined by the proper      design team process – nothing to do with the Ministerial brief!</li>
<li>The      project could go to seven stories because there was no design or      development overlay to restrict the height – only a heritage overlay.</li>
<li>The      trees to be removed were decided on the recommendation of an arborist.</li>
<li>The      justification of the small number of car parks, particularly in the social      housing section on the basis of predetermined ratios (.43 per unit in the      social housing and .77 per unit in the Stage 2), which took no account of      the local conditions or the needs of existing residents and business.</li>
<li>Failure      to answer the question about whether Stage 2 would actually be done, as it      was not to be funded with Federal money.</li>
</ul>
<p>There were a number of speakers who raised questions about the design and management of the social housing. A lack of confidence in Melbourne Affordable Housing to consult with and, to manage the relocation of exiting residents was voiced and questions were raised about the high number of one bedroom units.</p>
<p>Our local member, who is also the Minister of Education, answered concerns about how Errol  Street Primary   School would manage an influx of new local students.</p>
<p>Questions raised about the existing open space on Chetwynd Street and in the development were not adequately answered. The open access claimed by the experts as recreation space was clearly mainly for access, even though it was denied that it was a gated community.</p>
<p>The question about an agreement with the State Government that had been made long ago to use the Chetwynd Street open space for a child care centre appeared to be news to many of the planners.</p>
<p>Many other questions were asked, such as whether the medians would be breached and whether links could be made to the Church.</p>
<p>There was great concern about the measurement of heights, as the plans measured height above sea level and not above ground level, which gives a much more realistic picture of how high the buildings are relatively.  This created difficulties as the site dropped by 4m from east to west.</p>
<p>Our local member will take the issues raised at the meeting to the Minister of Housing, Richard Wynne, for further discussion.  It was not clear how this would be reported back to residents and local business, although a comprehensive list of attendees and their addresses were collected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/12/latrobe-close-redevelopment-meeting-with-bronwyn-pike-1122009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PPL AGM Speaker Paul Mees</title>
		<link>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/11/ppl-agm-speaker-paul-mees</link>
		<comments>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/11/ppl-agm-speaker-paul-mees#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic and access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nwma.org.au/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Members are invited to attend the PPL AGM on Saturday 5th December at 2.00 pm at the North Melbourne Library.  Further details as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>Dear PPL VIC  members and friends</p>
<p>Here is the reminder notice of Protectors of Public Lands Victoria Inc.&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Members are invited to attend the PPL AGM on Saturday 5th December at 2.00 pm at the North Melbourne Library.  Further details as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>Dear PPL VIC  members and friends</p>
<p>Here is the reminder notice of Protectors of Public Lands Victoria Inc. AGM 2009.  I am sending this out to members and contacts.</p>
<p>Dr Paul Mees is the guest speaker.  He has been a great supporter during campaigns opposing the East West Link which would have devastated inner city Melbourne and Royal and JJ Holland Park. Our joint community action helped ensure that the East West Link – the extension of the Eastern Freeway &#8211; with its super size road tunnels was deleted (albeit temporarily) from the Victorian Transport Plan.  We hope groups can show support for PPL VIC by attending. We would be pleased if you can advertise the meeting amongst your members.</p>
<p>Here are the details of our meeting:</p>
<p>Time: 1:45 pm for a 2 pm start</p>
<p>Date: Saturday 5 December 2009</p>
<p>Venue: Meeting Room 1 Upstairs North Melbourne Library 66 Errol Street North Melbourne. It is one building along from the Town Hall and Post Office on the south east corner of Errol and Queensberry Streets. Tram up Elizabeth Street from Flinders Street Station to Errol Street. Parking in surrounding streets. Disabled parking in front of Library.</p>
<p>Guest Speaker: Dr Paul Mees, senior lecturer in transport planning at RMIT, will speak on &#8220;The Cars that Ate Melbourne&#8221; &#8211; Public Transport Solutions for the State.”  Stay for afternoon tea and make contact with other groups, including transport action groups.</p>
<p>Background Note: See below link to Dr Mees’ Age article of 22 November 2009 “We can keep our leafy suburbs and still save the planet”. This was presented on 18 November as a paper at a “State of Australian Cities” Conference in Perth.  His book “Transport for Suburbia: Beyond the Automobile Age” will be released in December.</p>
<p>http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/we-can-keep-our-leafy-suburbs-and-still-save-the-planet-20091122-isqz.html</p>
<p>Contact: Julianne Bell Secretary Protectors of Public Lands Victoria Inc.  jbell5@bigpond.com Mobile 0408022408</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Julianne Bell</p>
<p>Secretary</p>
<p>Protectors of Public Lands Victoria Inc.</p>
<p>26 November 2009</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/11/ppl-agm-speaker-paul-mees/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>87 &#8211; 101 Roden Street  &#8211; Council support but off to VCAT</title>
		<link>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/11/87-101-roden-street-council-support-but-off-to-vcat</link>
		<comments>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/11/87-101-roden-street-council-support-but-off-to-vcat#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nwma.org.au/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The application for the development 92 units on the burnt out site of what was Staging Connections has now been decided by Council.  Council agreed to reduce the size of the project by not allowing the six story block at&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The application for the development 92 units on the burnt out site of what was Staging Connections has now been decided by Council.  Council agreed to reduce the size of the project by not allowing the six story block at the rear of the site and supported the widening of the internal courtyard space.  Unfortunately, the Council was late in deciding this question and it has been referred by the developers to VCAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/11/87-101-roden-street-council-support-but-off-to-vcat/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latrobe Close &#8211; 210 Chetwynd St. &#8211; Proposed development.</title>
		<link>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/11/latrobe-close-210-chetwynd-st-proposed-development</link>
		<comments>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/11/latrobe-close-210-chetwynd-st-proposed-development#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nwma.org.au/?p=579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This site, owned by the State Government, is a very substantial site in north and West Melbourne.  It is bounded  by Chetwynd Street, Courtney Street and Howard Street, the whole block north of St Mary&#8217;s Anglican Church.  The site is&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site, owned by the State Government, is a very substantial site in north and West Melbourne.  It is bounded  by Chetwynd Street, Courtney Street and Howard Street, the whole block north of St Mary&#8217;s Anglican Church.  The site is to be redeveloped intensively, 220 units, with about 120 Social Housing units being funded under the Federal &#8216;Nation Building&#8217; Program.  The State has instituted procedures for these projects which allow it to bypass normal planning processes.  The following general information has been provided by the Office of Local Member Bronwyn Pike. <a href="http://www.nwma.org.au/cms/wp-content/uploads/Latrobe-close-north-melbourne-SITE-1.pdf">Download details &#8211; Latrobe close north melbourne SITE-1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/11/latrobe-close-210-chetwynd-st-proposed-development/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Melbourne Rock Concert update</title>
		<link>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/10/north-melbourne-rock-concert-update</link>
		<comments>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/10/north-melbourne-rock-concert-update#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.nwma.org.au/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>North &#38; West Melbourne Association thanks the membership for the responses received. In the light of further information that has recently become available the Committee maintains its level of concern about this proposal. The further information consists of:</p>
<ul>
<li>Cost of admission&#8230;</li></ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North &amp; West Melbourne Association thanks the membership for the responses received. In the light of further information that has recently become available the Committee maintains its level of concern about this proposal. The further information consists of:</p>
<ul>
<li>Cost of admission to the event is to be $75-00 per head.</li>
<li>The target audience is to be 25-30 year age group, plus, and not orientated  to youth or families.</li>
<li>The event is not part of the open day family multicultural activity which is proposed to be on the 14th February 2010.</li>
<li>Aussie Rock on Arden is a stand alone commercial event proposed for Saturday 20th March 2010 between 2-00pm and midnight.</li>
<li>The main performers are Jimmy Barnes and John Farnham – chosen to appeal to an older audience.</li>
</ul>
<p>Whilst the above information is confirmed, the Melbourne City Councillors appear to have only been briefed on this issue at a private meeting at the Town Hall. The matter has not been to a Council committee meeting where normally a detailed report would be available for public scrutiny. The Association is concerned about the process to date.</p>
<p>A number of issues are still unresolved:</p>
<ul>
<li>Proper standards for the conduct of the event including, infrastructure protection, public safety and health issues have not been defined.</li>
<li>The Rock concert is not part of the opening and is actually being held 5 weeks later.</li>
<li>It is a commercial event and it appears no opportunity exists for local youth to perform.</li>
<li>Is the event consistent with the lease between the Council and the football club?</li>
<li>Is State Government approval required for this event.?</li>
<li>Are the Melbourne City Councillors going to make the decision on this proposal at a public committee and council meeting, or just leave it to the administration?</li>
<li>What impact will the event have on the grassed surface and other recreation areas and facilities?</li>
<li>What is the expected attendance of this event and what is the expected impact on the surrounding area?</li>
<li>Will this event create a precedent for similar events in future years?</li>
<li>The event appears to have little to do with the Language and Learning Centre or multiculturalism.</li>
<li>Whilst comments have been made about sharing the profits between the Football Club, Language and Learning Centre and the community, no clear guidelines have been provided for the distribution.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/10/north-melbourne-rock-concert-update/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Horse polo in Royal Park</title>
		<link>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/10/horse-polo-in-royal-park</link>
		<comments>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/10/horse-polo-in-royal-park#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.nwma.org.au/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night (13th October 2009) the Finance and Governance Committee of the Melbourne City Council rejected the proposal for a Horse Polo event on prime recreation land next to the Hockey and Netball Centre.  This is a great decision for&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night (13th October 2009) the Finance and Governance Committee of the Melbourne City Council rejected the proposal for a Horse Polo event on prime recreation land next to the Hockey and Netball Centre.  This is a great decision for the users of Royal Park where it was proposed to remove a number of trees. A range of other issues such as parking,  traffic and public safety are still of concern to the community.  The North &amp; West Melbourne Association will continue to monitor this issue as it is possible that it may be referred to the full Council meeting where the numbers could change.  It is understood the Lord Mayor and Councillor Peter Clarke (believed to be a strong supporter of the proposal) were absent from the meeting last night so the decision is at risk of being overturned. It is believed this proposal would require the State Government to amend the regulations controlling Royal Park.</p>
<p>Please make your view known to the Melbourne City Councillors and to the local member Bronwyn Pike.</p>
<p>Polo in Royal Park  <a href="http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/opm/bc/CTEE/meetings/FC_55b_20091013.pdf" target="_blank">Download</a> (201KB)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/10/horse-polo-in-royal-park/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flemington Railway in The Age</title>
		<link>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/10/flemington-railway-in-the-age</link>
		<comments>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/10/flemington-railway-in-the-age#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public transport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.nwma.org.au/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We have supported the proposal to extend the railway line from the Flemington racecourse and Showgrounds to the new housing proposal  for the old munitions site in Maribyrnong.  It could connect to the Victoria University and Highpoint Shopping Centre.  Read&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have supported the proposal to extend the railway line from the Flemington racecourse and Showgrounds to the new housing proposal  for the old munitions site in Maribyrnong.  It could connect to the Victoria University and Highpoint Shopping Centre.  Read the report from <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/call-for-littleused-line-to-service-new-homes-20090517-b7da.html">The Age: Maribyrnong Railway </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nwma.org.au/news/2009/10/flemington-railway-in-the-age/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
